‘‘In the future, everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes,’’ dictum by Andy Warhol. Which shows that Andy Warhol believes that everyone could be famous. Andy Warhol’s statement is truly a ‘short famous’. His statement were contradicted by many people at the time. The concept has been changed from Warhol’s notion of instant fame into ‘‘In the future, we will all be famous to fifteen people.’’ 

Being a microcelebrity, the internet always leads people to question distinctions between privacy and publicity, there are so many website and apps leading people to show themselves and trying to lead normal people become a micricelebrity. An example of Justin Bieber, he is being discovered from YouTube by his singing video, but now there are only a few people don’t know his name. His neighbors or friends didn’t expect him to be as famous as he is today at that time. “Familiar strangers’’ which means people they know each others is not by names or communication but by sight. Like you know that person but never talk to him. It also can be you see some news or video, which is famous on the Internet, and its main characters are strangers around you.

Microcelebrity means some new opportunity but some new threats too, it also means some new responsibilities you have to faced. I think it can be say as Microcelebrity is changing and affecting people’s lives in different ways. 

There are so many films about video games and there are so many video games based on films. It is clear that computer and video games are working to remediate film. 

Some of the straightforward of remediation in Hollywood being calls as “repurposing”, they using the character from the film transferring to video games, for example, with The Lord of the Rings (Peter Jackson, 2001, 2002, 2003) and Harry Potter (Chris Columbus, 2001, 2002; Alfonso Cuarón, 2004; Mike Newell, 2005; David Yates, 2007). Some of the characterization and plot are being borrowed from the video games. Also film respond to the challenge of digital media. In sometimes that filmmakers will reuse the characters and background story from the some of the  successful video games, such as Mortal Kombat, Tomb Raider, and Resident Evil.

In general terms, that the films are important to remediation by digital media, films and video games are hugely popular and economically important, they are defining the important that the nature of visual story are based on the experiences of digital formats. Games are not narratives in the strict sense which means that games are not generally have an explicit narrator or implicit narrative voice. Most genres of games are based on a story, although not narrative in the strict sense, otherwise it will being conflict between narrative and the quality of “interactive.” Films are narratives in the strict sense, which needs are story based also have an explicit narrator or implicit narrative voice tell the story, but films can borrow the characterization and plot from the games.

Absolutely, Filmic narrative is successfully combined with an interactive role, filmmakers can borrow the characterization and plot from many other place like video games, and the combination  is still be recognised as film. Also sometimes video games can also combined with films. 

Is photography dead? And who killed it? Or is it just reborn? In my opinion, of course photography isn’t dead. Some of the people feels like that photography is dead and they think is technology killed it, but it also can be a reborn of photography which is the start of a revival of the art. “To collect photographs is to collect the world.” In ours life, everyday people from different position is creating many of incredible pictures and they are documenting the world around them in so many different ways. 

Camera is goes into family life,  one of the sociological study from France, that most householders have got a camera, they were using it to memorize theirs daily life. At the same time, there were millions of pictures being created are shared online. The number of photographers is getting bigger and bigger, the technology and internet drives them to a new elite and goes into a higher levels.

Everyone has a camera on their phone. Photography isn’t dead but career as a photographer is no longer easy .we are living in a time where everyone is a photographer and to succeed as a photographer has become very tough. 

Photography cant be dead ever, only the way and technology of taking shot may be changed. Technology has brought up a huge change but the necessity is still the same for photography. In reality photography is reviving.  refer to the author sontag that she think photography as a tool of people which support the human society.